{"id":465,"date":"2020-08-11T15:11:34","date_gmt":"2020-08-11T06:11:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/artfront.co.jp\/en_2025\/?p=465"},"modified":"2025-10-21T10:36:57","modified_gmt":"2025-10-21T01:36:57","slug":"why-i-work-with-artists-an-interview-with-hiroshi-hara-on-the-occasion-of-the-shintaro-tanaka-exhibition","status":"publish","type":"news_blog","link":"https:\/\/artfront.co.jp\/en\/news_blog\/why-i-work-with-artists-an-interview-with-hiroshi-hara-on-the-occasion-of-the-shintaro-tanaka-exhibition\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cWhy I Work With Artists\u201d \u2013An interview with Hiroshi Hara on the occasion of the Shintaro Tanaka exhibition"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Art Front Gallery has collaborated with numerous artists in hopes to make use of art in development projects and living spaces. It is indeed a challenge for both artists and us to create works that an unspecified number of people view and engage with under various conditions as opposed to within museums and galleries, yet we believe that these projects serve to re-question the meaning of art that connects people and places, as well as people and people. One of such artists whom we have worked with over the years is Shintaro Tanaka, who passed away in August last year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the occasion of Shintaro Tanaka\u2019s solo exhibition<\/strong> \u201cThe Landscape Veers Perpendicularly\u201d <\/strong>(August 8 \u2013 October 18, 2020) being held at the Ichihara Lakeside Museum<\/a>, we spoke with architect Hiroshi Hara who has maintained a close relationship with Tanaka since the 1960s, and asked him to talk about Tanaka\u2019s works and reflect on the 1960s in which they met, and also the reason as to why he works with artists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2015\u2015You were born in 1936, and Shintaro Tanaka in 1940. That is to say, you are almost of the same generation. Could you tell us about how you two met one another?<\/strong>

Hara:<\/strong> We first met one another on the occasion of the \u201cFrom Space to Environment\u201d exhibition in 1966. The art critic Yoshiaki Tono curated the exhibition, and he had selected a number of promising artists to take part, which included the likes of Keiji Usami, Shintaro Tanaka, and myself. Tono enjoyed skin diving so at one time we all went to the island of Hachijo-jima to catch fish. Tono was a truly wonderful person, and it is a great shame that he is no longer with us as he had succeeded in bringing people from various fields together. I wonder if there\u2019s anyone in our generation who had managed to play a role like him.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2015\u2015The \u201cFrom Space to Environment\u201d exhibition was a crosscutting venture in art, design, architecture, photography, music, and other creative fields. The 1960s seemed to be a lively and vibrant era in which diverse people met and collaborated with one another.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hara:<\/strong> Yes, those were indeed vibrant times. However, looking back on Japanese history, the 1200s, when the Heian period was about to end, or had just ended, was an incredible era in which three remarkable figures, Kamo no Chomei (1155-1216), Fujiwara no Teika (1162-1241) and Dogen (1200-1253) were all alive at the same time. The 60s by no means stands a chance against this era, yet still, the times weren\u2019t so bad. As it is in fact apparent today, by the time we were born, the world was already somewhat organized, and there was a real sense of beginning. The times permeated with a feeling of naivet\u00e9 and also harbored various possibilities. It was a time in which dialectic thinking and the concept of \u201cNot-not\u201d were at once present. It is to raise a question not under the pretense that there is one correct answer, but rather, was a situation in which two things appeared to overlap with one another. No matter what one does, it may in fact be meaningless. Nevertheless, I think we all firmly believed in one thing, and in doing so, attempted to create a system or narrative. In terms of someone of my generation, Nobel laureate novelist,Kenzaburo Oe is a good example. Ever since his novel A Personal Matter <\/em>(1964), he has built his very own device and has continued to write while repeating the same pattern. I am truly amazed by his obstinance. I feel that Shintaro Tanaka was also such an artist.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2015\u2015How was your impression of Shintaro Tanaka? <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Shintaro
Shintaro TANAKA (1940-2019)<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Hara:<\/strong> As you know, Shintaro Tanaka had not attended an art university. In our generation, there were some artists who did not go to university while some artists did. The former include figures such as Toru Takemitsu, Shuntaro Tanikawa, Keiji Usami, and Kiyoshi Awazu. Takemitsu for example, had the air of an artist just by the way he presented and carried himself, which you could sense even when he was simply just standing there. I think Tanaka too was likely this kind of person. He was always standing straight and upright, and I wonder whether he had continued to pursue this sense of uprightness throughout his entire life. God states that it is difficult for humans to stand upright. Buildings are also basically built to stand upright. In architecture the term \u201cvertical\u201d is used, which refers to the direction in which gravity acts, and the basis of architecture is thus to create a means to be free from this gravitational force. Architecture can collapse if it remains unstable, therefore erectness and verticality are at once the fundamental principles and challenges of architecture. Tanaka appeared to create works with a certain sense of instability reminiscent of a balancing toy, yet what he had in essence created were works that maintained both balance and stability through abandoning the anxiety towards the needs for them to be vertical. Despite their seemingly unstable state, they perfectly settle into place. I feel that perhaps the principle of his aesthetic was to maintain a situation in which humans, in the midst of, and because of this very contradiction, were necessitated to stand upright. In 2001 he created a work titled Pianissimo of North Sky<\/em><\/strong> in the approach leading up towards Sapporo Dome<\/a><\/strong>. It is a remarkable work that takes on the form of a mobile. I am also very fond of his work with the red dragonfly, <\/em>which he created in the previous year for the Echigo-Tsumari Art Triennale<\/a> 2000.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Shintaro
Shintaro TANAKA Pianissimo of North Sky<\/i>, 2001, Sapporo Dome<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a>
Shintaro TANAKA The\u25cb\u25b3\u25a1Tower and the Red Dragonfly<\/i> ,2000, Echigo-Tsumari Art Triennale photo by Kasane Nogawa<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

\u2015\u2015Shintaro Tanaka had also engaged in numerous commission works, leaving behind an array of high-quality projects, and also continuing to produce work until the very final years of his life.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n


Hara:<\/strong> Even if it appears from the outside like someone is repeating the same thing, he\/she would lose interest or become indifferent if he\/she did not believe in history and have the awareness of sharing history. Humans are existences that can be in doubt and lose their way. An artist is always at odds with his or herself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2015\u2015You have worked with artists on numerous occasions. There are many architects that regard their architecture as a complete work in its own right, yet many of the buildings you have designed serve to engage with art. The first case was the Umeda Sky Building (1993), in which Art Front Gallery was also involved. Tanaka\u2019s work is installed in this building as well.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
The Umeda Sky Building photo:Katsuaki Mawatari\/Junji Matsuo<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Shintaro Tanaka Anemophilous flower<\/em>,1993, The Umeda Sky Building<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Hara:<\/strong> Yes, it was my idea to incorporate art, but in terms of Umeda, I believe it was also a decision on part of the client Sekisui House. We architects constantly find ourselves to be anxious. What if things fall or collapse due to an earthquake, and end up putting people\u2019s lives at risk? We are always nerve-ridden thinking about these things, as we indeed have a responsibility. That being said, when we form a team so that the responsibility doesn\u2019t fall on the individual, we tend to become overconfident. Artists aren\u2019t as nervous and don\u2019t live in fear and anxiety, yet they take on all responsibility on their own. They may of course work as a team from time to time, yet they stand as individuals. Ultimately, it is the actions of each individual that come to surface within history. Artists are people who firmly hold their ground. That\u2019s why we get along with each other. Architects perceive and understand the world in a superficial way. They are arrogant, while they should be humble. Architects don\u2019t understand that there are people in the world of art, science, mathematics et al that are so remarkable, that they are beyond comparable to themselves. The fact that there were the three great masters of the 1200s, as well as the sheer tension of the 1960s when great figures like Sartre and Camus were alive. The works of Christo, who passed away recently, were easy to comprehend, yet had reflected his highly acute and computational mindset. Joseph Kosuth is also very intelligent. Tanaka\u2019s practice is easy to comprehend as well. I feel that he continued to produce work by repeatedly suppressing his sensibility under the pretense that magnets and balancing toys were all that existed in the world, and further believing in this principle. This is essentially what is so remarkable about his practice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n